Meeting on Home Mail Delivery – April 9

Subject: FW: Kitchissippi Town Hall on Defending Home Mail Delivery, Wed Apr 9, 7pm
Date: Wed, 9 Apr 2014 13:30:38 +0000
From: CoChair1

Short notice, as event is tonight but it just came.

Kitchissippi Town Hall:
Defend Our Home Mail Delivery!

Wednesday, April 9th, 7:00pm
Hintonburg Community Centre
1064 Wellington St.

Canada Post announced on December 11 that all door-to-door delivery would be terminated across Canada, something that no country has ever done. Their plan begins as early as this fall in Kanata. Will Kitchissippi be next?

This is an issue that Kitchissippi / Ward 15 residents care deeply about. All residents, but especially seniors and persons with disabilities, depend on and benefit from home mail delivery. A growing number of mayors, city councils, and other elected leaders are expressing their opposition to Canada Post’s announcement.

Please come out to attend this open, Town Hall meeting to discuss what is happening, how our municipal and other elected representatives have responded, and what we might do in the coming months to defend OUR home delivery.

Speakers at the event will include:

NICK APLIN (81-year-old Kitchissippi senior & activist)
PETER DENLEY (CUPW)
SHELLIE BIRD (Kitchissippi resident with Solidarity Against Austerity)

Organized by Solidarity Against Austerity
http://maydayottawa.ca/

Pipeline Wine & Cheese January 20 2014

Full red wine glass gobletAre you concerned about the planned tar sands oil pipeline that would run inside Ottawa city limits and cross the Rideau River?

If so YOU’RE INVITED to a friendly social event Jwhere our elected officials from all three levels of government will be available to chat and will each say a few words about the pipeline.

It takes place January 20th at 7pm Charles Hodgson’s home here in Champlain Park. Ottawa City Councillor Katherine Hobbs; Ontario Minister of Labour Yasir Naqvi; and Member of Parliament for Ottawa Center Paul Dewar will all be in attendance.

Attendance limited to 40 residents of Kitchissippi ward. Please RSVP here.

Tunney’s Pasture Master Plan Info Session – November 27

From: Scott.Manning@tpsgc-pwgsc.gc.ca
Sent: 19/11/2013 7:50:14 A.M. Eastern Standard Time
Subj: Tunney’s Pasture Master Plan – Public Information Session on Preferred Development Option

To: Champlain Park Community Association
Attn: Heather Pearl/ CoChair1

This is an invitation for you and members of your association to attend an upcoming public information session on the Tunney’s Pasture master plan. The purpose of this session is twofold: to present the preferred development option for the master plan and to receive public feedback. To be held as an open house format, members of the public can attend at a time convenient to them, as follows:

Date: Wednesday, November 27, 2013
Time: 5 – 8 p.m.
Place: Conference Room, Jean Talon Building, 1st Floor, 170 Tunney’s Pasture Driveway, Ottawa

Newspaper ads will be published in the Citizen, Le Droit and Kitchissippi Times to inform the public of this event, but please feel free to extend this invitation to others through your community contacts. Free parking will be available after 4:30 p.m. in the parking lot situated between Parkdale Avenue and the Jean Talon Building.

Thank you,

Scott Manning, MCIP, RPP
Principal Portfolio Urban Planner/ Urbaniste principal du portefeuille
Development & Urban Planning/ Développement et urbanisme
Strategic Portfolio Planning/ Planification stratégique du portefeuille
NCA Portfolio Management/ Gestion du portefeuille de la RCN
Real Property Branch/ Direction générale des biens immobiliers
PWGSC / TPSGC
(819) 956-6323

Scott Street CDP presentation

CDP Tunneys Pasture

Suggest checkout the Scott Street Community Design Plan (CDP) presentation for more information and details on what’s being proposed in the neighbourhoods adjoining Champlain Park.

CDP Where we are in the process
The material was presented on October 9, 2013, at a public meeting, held in the Hintonburg Community Centre.

The last page of the presentation lists a number of questions which were posed at the meeting.

Renaming of Ottawa River Parkway

 Informational

The NCC would like to inform you and your community members that the Ottawa River Parkway has been renamed the Sir John A. Macdonald Parkway.
Please view the attached the news release announcement:
Kind regards, René Coignaud
Officer, Public Consultations | Agent, Consultations publiques
National Capital Commission | Commission de la capitale nationale
Tel./Tél.  613-239-5683 | Fax /Télécopieur  613-239-5274
Email /Courriel   rene.coignaud@ncc-ccn.ca

www.canadascapital.gc.ca

Tunney’s Pasture Plans

Monday evening Sept 17 saw the underwhelming revelation of two options for the future of Tunney’s Pasture. This so-called public consultation consisted of display panels with one or two consultants available to explain them. A Show but no tell, with no presentation with an opportunity for comments and questions in an audience situation (where one question or comment can spark another). In addition the public was presumably supposed to choose between the marginally different two options. The web site gives the following as the goals, objectives and principles:

Goals and Objectives of the Master Plan

  • Create a leading-edge employment community
  • Achieve high standards in urban design, planning and sustainable design
  • Be a connected, transit-oriented development
  • Guide long-term investment
  • Complement the NCC and City of Ottawa long-term plans
  • Contribute to the federal image in the National Capital Region

Guiding Principles:

  1. Be a landmark environmentally sustainable employment site.
  2. Be an integrated and valued part of a larger community.
  3. Be an attractive, safe, and complete employment site.
  4. Be a connected and public transit-oriented development.
  5. Provide a diverse mix of uses and arrangement of buildings.
  6. The Master Plan should be flexible in its application to the site.
  7. Maximize federal government values and new opportunities.

These seem not to include the goal of creating a mixed use community and to emphasize the role of Tunney’s Pasture as an employment site.

Both options are discussed below with their minor differences pointed out. Firstly we will give the broad picture of both options. Both option show any housing in the near future placed along the Parkdale face of the Pasture. (Both options have some segments for future development designated as either housing or office). Both options have a hub of service retail placed opposite the transit station. Both options have the same amount and placement of Labs and designation of some existing buildings as heritage (Brooke Claxton; Health Protection, and Statistics Canada Main buildings plus the Central Heating and Cooling Plant). Other than some minor retail the rest of the Pasture would be assigned as Office or Lab, with slightly different amounts and placements of these and greenspace. A path through to our Champlain Park is shown and both options include a thick green buffer on the western border of the site.

This interpretation of mixed use with blocks of office /labs taking up most of the space in the area west of Parkdale frontage and north of the immediate vicinity of the transit area, i.e. with retail and housing mainly on the periphery seems somewhat out of kilter, Why not have made one of the interior streets a residential one mixed with office and retail? Or placed more of the retail along the western half of Tunney’s Pasture Parkway (the boulevard area)? Perhaps even planning a few high rises to take advantage of the river and hills views at the northern end of the Pasture?

To go into the differences between the two options I will cite some numbers first as follows:

Item Option 1 Option 2
Housing: 800 1000
Office total: 726,000 m2 GFA 641,000 m2 GFA
(gross floor area)
Labs total 42,000 m2 GFA 42,000 m2 GFA
Office new: 453,000 m2 GFA 368,000 m2 GFA
Retail total 52,000 m2 GFA 49,000 m2 GFA
Retail Hub 49,000 m2 GFA 38,000 m2 GFA
Future dev. 110,000 m2 GFA 100,000 m2 GFA
Total: 930,000 m2 GFA
800 units
832,000 m2 GFA
1000 units

As the Option with the most housing and I believe greenspace Option 2 seems preferable. However as suggested earlier neither option seems to be truly mixed use and the concept plan lacks imagination and more detailed principles related to ensuring sunshine on the street, avoidance of wind tunnels and other design factor related to encouragement of pedestrian use. A hint of a possible water feature in the boulevard area of Option 2 is one of the few suggestions of a plus factor.

Residents are encouraged to make comments before Oct. 9.

By Post: Tunney’s Pasture Master Plan Project, Real Property Branch, Public Works and Government Services Canada, 191 Promenade du Portage Gatineau, QC, K1A 0S5 Canada or

By Email tunneyspastureplan.planpretunney@pwgsc-tpsgc.gc.ca

Western Parkway and the LRT

LRT

However given the prospect of someone persuading the National Capital Commission (NCC) to let the City of Ottawa put Light Rail Transit (LRT) on the Western Parkway I thought it time to say something.   This is my take on that follows.

Contributor: Amy Kempster:  An Amy’s Corner article – September-2012. 

The Western Parkway and the LRT:  The question is should the desire for fast transit for Kanata trump the idea of using the Transit stations for nodes of intensification.  Any route except Carling is aimed to some extent at fast transit for Kanata.  There are very valid reasons why the emphasis should be on intensification.  While communities are often  not fond of intensification it is necessary if we want to avoid more urban sprawl.  One can argue if the needed intensification can be achieved without skyscrapers or other tall buildings but it is clear that intensification is the best way to accommodate much of the inevitable growth.  This is because the costs of providing services to far-flung suburbs often exceed the increase in taxes stemming from their  construction.  The Western Parkway being to a large extend bounded on its non-river side by low-rise successful communities is obviously not a place where one would wish to intensify (nor is the Byron strip).  The lower cost of the Western Parkway route might be negated in the long run by the costs of the urban sprawl which would result from the lesser intensification possible on that route.  Note that the supply of urban land has been significantly increased by the recent  Ontario Municipal Board (OMB)  and  Council decisions.  We do not need in further increase.

The Region when it set up the satellite communities beyond the Greenbelt (Kanata, Orleans/Stittsville, Barrhaven and Leitrim) intended them to be complete, i.e. to include employment for much of their labour force.  Kanata is the one which has come closest to this intention and there is considerable employment in the Kanata  area.  Thus my suggestion: forget LRT as a really fast system for the west end and  use it instead to ensure good transit for west-end residents inside the Greenbelt to downtown  and for intensification along Carling.  LRT will work well for Orleans and using the O-train for Leitrim and Barrhaven.  So what about Kanata commuters?  For the next several years the plan was to have them change at Tunney’s Pasture from the buses into the LRT.  I see no reason why this service could not continue and the route for the LRT use Carling but on a schedule which builds a portion at a time so that the costs can be managed.

Many people have talked about the current lack of access to the river and the lack of animation along our waterways.  For the canal downtown and the Ottawa from Chaudiere Falls this is probably merited.  In the western portion of the Ottawa I think this is somewhat exaggerated by people who have not walked or biked along the river.  Access is available at Remic Rapids, from Champlain Park, at Island Park Drive, at Westboro Beach and Woodroffe either with lights or under highway passes.  Parking lots exist at Remic Rapids, Champlain Bridge, Westboro Beach and Woodroffe.  It is also possible to cross the parkway by foot at other spots outside the rush hours.  Adding the LRT would make this last type of access almost impossible especially if the LRT was fenced off.  If one lane of the Parkway was used for it this might as well have an effect on the bicycle use of the road.

In connection with animation a seasonal café exists at Westboro Beach.  Possibly a drink stand might be viable at Woodroffe and/or Island Park Drive.  Memories of the restaurant on Bate Island just off Champlain Bridge suggest that it may not be easy to succeed in such locations.  Great changes to the bordering communities might be required to have the population for such animation as I think is daydream.  Such changes would not be welcomed  by the communities involved so I doubt that much animation can be added.

The Western Parkway can provide a soothing drive and I suspect it helps many people de-stress as they wend their way home or to work.  The aesthetic and natural values it provides would be sullied by the LRT, and for no benefit for most inside the Greenbelt residents of western Ottawa.  It also provides a lovely entrance to Ottawa for tourists who come from the south and west, if they find its entrance near Pinecrest.  Visitors I have asked about the addition of rail to it are always surprised that anyone would suggest such a thing.  Therefor I fully support the opposition of the NCC to its use for LRT.