Western Parkway and the LRT

LRT

However given the prospect of someone persuading the National Capital Commission (NCC) to let the City of Ottawa put Light Rail Transit (LRT) on the Western Parkway I thought it time to say something.   This is my take on that follows.

Contributor: Amy Kempster:  An Amy’s Corner article – September-2012. 

The Western Parkway and the LRT:  The question is should the desire for fast transit for Kanata trump the idea of using the Transit stations for nodes of intensification.  Any route except Carling is aimed to some extent at fast transit for Kanata.  There are very valid reasons why the emphasis should be on intensification.  While communities are often  not fond of intensification it is necessary if we want to avoid more urban sprawl.  One can argue if the needed intensification can be achieved without skyscrapers or other tall buildings but it is clear that intensification is the best way to accommodate much of the inevitable growth.  This is because the costs of providing services to far-flung suburbs often exceed the increase in taxes stemming from their  construction.  The Western Parkway being to a large extend bounded on its non-river side by low-rise successful communities is obviously not a place where one would wish to intensify (nor is the Byron strip).  The lower cost of the Western Parkway route might be negated in the long run by the costs of the urban sprawl which would result from the lesser intensification possible on that route.  Note that the supply of urban land has been significantly increased by the recent  Ontario Municipal Board (OMB)  and  Council decisions.  We do not need in further increase.

The Region when it set up the satellite communities beyond the Greenbelt (Kanata, Orleans/Stittsville, Barrhaven and Leitrim) intended them to be complete, i.e. to include employment for much of their labour force.  Kanata is the one which has come closest to this intention and there is considerable employment in the Kanata  area.  Thus my suggestion: forget LRT as a really fast system for the west end and  use it instead to ensure good transit for west-end residents inside the Greenbelt to downtown  and for intensification along Carling.  LRT will work well for Orleans and using the O-train for Leitrim and Barrhaven.  So what about Kanata commuters?  For the next several years the plan was to have them change at Tunney’s Pasture from the buses into the LRT.  I see no reason why this service could not continue and the route for the LRT use Carling but on a schedule which builds a portion at a time so that the costs can be managed.

Many people have talked about the current lack of access to the river and the lack of animation along our waterways.  For the canal downtown and the Ottawa from Chaudiere Falls this is probably merited.  In the western portion of the Ottawa I think this is somewhat exaggerated by people who have not walked or biked along the river.  Access is available at Remic Rapids, from Champlain Park, at Island Park Drive, at Westboro Beach and Woodroffe either with lights or under highway passes.  Parking lots exist at Remic Rapids, Champlain Bridge, Westboro Beach and Woodroffe.  It is also possible to cross the parkway by foot at other spots outside the rush hours.  Adding the LRT would make this last type of access almost impossible especially if the LRT was fenced off.  If one lane of the Parkway was used for it this might as well have an effect on the bicycle use of the road.

In connection with animation a seasonal café exists at Westboro Beach.  Possibly a drink stand might be viable at Woodroffe and/or Island Park Drive.  Memories of the restaurant on Bate Island just off Champlain Bridge suggest that it may not be easy to succeed in such locations.  Great changes to the bordering communities might be required to have the population for such animation as I think is daydream.  Such changes would not be welcomed  by the communities involved so I doubt that much animation can be added.

The Western Parkway can provide a soothing drive and I suspect it helps many people de-stress as they wend their way home or to work.  The aesthetic and natural values it provides would be sullied by the LRT, and for no benefit for most inside the Greenbelt residents of western Ottawa.  It also provides a lovely entrance to Ottawa for tourists who come from the south and west, if they find its entrance near Pinecrest.  Visitors I have asked about the addition of rail to it are always surprised that anyone would suggest such a thing.  Therefor I fully support the opposition of the NCC to its use for LRT.

Debrief on meeting of Kitchissippi Community Associations

From: CoChair1
Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2012 01:27:13 +0000

Please see below attached minutes of a meeting I attended last night on behalf of CPCA. Charles Hodgson was also there representing his Ecology group. There is one other name from Champlain Park, but I don’t know that individual.

CoChair1



From: ceofride@hotmail.com
Subject: Debrief on tonight’s meeting of Kitchissippi community associations
Date: Sun, 24 Jun 2012 23:39:51 -0400

Please see attached debrief/minute.

Many thanks to Katie and Christoph for organizing and hosting this very productive and enjoyable meeting!

Céo

Meeting 20120624 of Kitchissippi Community Associations.pdf

168 Carleton Development Proposal Update

An update from our community association co-chair CoChair1:

The final revised design for three units (instead of the originally proposed four units) has now been approved, and a supplementary OMB Decision has been issued.  The original and supplementary decisions are attached.  Drawings and other documentation related to the approvals process are on file at the Committee of Adjustment office, 101 Centrepointe Drive.

The revised design was arrived at as a result of a negotiation process facilitated by the lawyers for both parties.  It  features a single-detached home with  a peaked roof at the corner of Carleton and Clearview and a semi-detached home on the interior Carleton Avenue lot with a flat roof.  All of the dwellings are two storey,  with rooftop decks designed to mitigate privacy and overlook.

The Clearview Avenue facade of the corner unit animates the street across from the park and the report of a Forestry expert confirms that the revised design will allow the distinctive bur oak on this lot to be preserved, when combined with other prescribed preservation measures.  Set-backs on Carleton Avenue have been increased to allow more room for soft landscaping and leaving space for three new street trees to replace the two that will be removed.

The revised design features the following changes to what was originally proposed at the Committee of Adjustment on June 1, 2011:

  • Formerly proposed semi-detached lot/dwellings on north half of existing 100 X 100 foot lot on the corner of Carleton and Clearview avenues, replaced by single lot/dwelling;
  • Setback of dwellings from Carleton increased from range of 3 – 5.4 metres to range of 4.65-6.16 metres to increase greenspace and more closely reflect existing pattern of development in neighbourhood;
  • Setback radius from mature Burr Oak adjacent to Clearview Avenue increased from previous application to 6 metres consistently to reduce potential development impacts upon tree (as per IFS Forestry report)
  • Driveway lengths along Carleton will be 5.62 metres (includes the section of the City Right of Way between the sidewalk and the property line) to lessen the potential for vehicles to  overhang and block sidewalk;
  • Number of street trees proposed along Carleton increased from two to three and species changed from Amur Maple to Service Berry and Hackberry (based on recommendation from  IFS Forestry Consultant);
  • Height of northernmost building increased from 7.3 metres to 8.31 metres to accommodate a pitched roof design on the new single family dwelling;
  • Height of southernmost semi-detached dwellings reduced from 7.3 metres to 6.9 metres.

168 Carleton OMB Decision May 22 2012 case PL110694.pdf

204 Northwestern Avenue Redevelopment Proposal – Follow-Up

From our community association co-chair CoChair1:

June 1, 2012

Re: Follow-Up to May 22, 2012 Meeting Regarding 204 Northwestern Avenue Development Proposal

At the meeting, we discussed everyone’s individual concerns, and then Heather and myself summarized what we could and could not address as a community association based on the planning principles and documents that form the basis of our evaluation framework.

I have just completed a successful negotiation process with the Owners through their architect, Rosaline Hill.  I have copied below the most pertinent information related to our negotiations.

A. E-mail from architect subsequent to our letter stating our remaining concerns

Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 14:14:41 -0400
Subject: Re: 204 Northwestern Follow-Up to May 22 Presentation
From: rosaline@rjhill.ca
To: CoChair1
CC: […]

Hello Everyone,

I have reviewed your comments along with other comments we have received.

Adam and Michael have agreed to the following changes:

  1. We will delete the rear roof patio,
  2. We will include plants between the driveways that will survive, as per your examples,
  3. We will reduce the width of the proposed front walkways from 4′ to 3′-8″, increasing the soft landscaping by 7.5sq.ft. in front of each semi.

Additional changes to our submission, not relating to your requests, will include:

  1. A revision to the draft R plan showing a narrow easement on the north side, in favour of 198 Northwester Ave, for vehicular access.
  2. A correction to the noted rear yard dimensions.  I have not changed the design or the location of the rear wall.  Drawings to date have shown the dimensions to the rear wall not including the chimney.  Because the chimney has living space above it, I will shift the dimension line to include it, as per the bylaw.
  3. I will amend the noted units sizes to be 2550sq.ft. plus basement.
  4. I will note on the drawing that the roof top patio (at the front) is 10’x15′.

B. Motion to Support Proposal Based on the e-mail above

A motion was passed unanimously by the Champlain Park Community Association Executive, dated May 31, 2012.  A more detailed letter will be sent to the Committee of Adjustment.

The Champlain Park Community Association (CPCA) supports the application for minor variances on lot width for the proposal to build a semi-detached home at 204 Northwestern Avenue (D08-01-12/B-00165 and B-00185 & D08-02-12/A-00164 and A-00184).

The CPCA and the proponents, Adam Gard and Michael Ayoub, Timberville Developments, have engaged in a successful negotiation process via their representative, architect Rosaline Hill.  This has resulted in a proposal that has addressed the major concerns and considerations of the association, based on Planning Principles, related to this specific site.

C. Notes Related to Issues Discussed at the Meeting

We discussed the neighbours’ concerns at the meeting and clarified what we could and could not address based on the planning principles.

We clarified the following points:

  • This is a contemporary style of architecture.  They are using more traditional finishing materials to soften the look of the buildings.
  • We advocated to eliminate rear yard privacy and overlook concerns related to rooftop decks,  as this is supported by City of Ottawa Official Plan policies.  In order to address our concerns, they have eliminated the rooftop decks originally overlooking the rear yard, while retaining those at the front.
  • The deeper lot depth on Northwestern (130 to 140 feet) means that only one minor variance (lot width) is required whereas other lots in the community with 100 foot depths require variances on both lot width and area.
  • This proposal is for a building of moderate size compared to some of the proposals that have been problematic on Northwestern.
  • This proposal has a well inset partial 3rd storey, that takes up 35% of the floor space compared to the floor below. This was a site specific variable that was assessed in the context of the overall proposal.  In this instance, adding living space to a partial 3rd storey has allowed them to have a very deep back yard so they are able to preserve some mature trees that will be an asset to the neighbourhood.
  • Note that the front yards of new semi-detached development will never have as extensive a “green presence” as the homes they are replacing, but the City has improved the requirements via the new by-law. The Owners have improved the front yard landscaping to address the new by-law provisions at our request.

Committee of Adjustment Hearing (Consent to Sever into Two Parcels and Minor Variances on Lot Width):

June 6, 3 PM, 101 Centrepointe Drive

Write:
Re: File Numbers: (D08-01-12/B-00165 and B-00185 & D08-02-12/A-00164 and A-00184)
Committee of Adjustment
101 Centrepointe Dr.
Ottawa  ON K2G5K7
Fax:  613-580-2436
E-mail:  cofa@ottawa.ca

CoChair1
Co-Chair, Champlain Park Community Association